Friday, August 10, 2012

A Lack of Logic in the Selection Process.


When India won the 2012 world cup, the Indian selectors got a big fat bonus on top of a big fat salary. Why? Because they selected the team that won the world cup. So when India lost 8-0 away in England and Australia, you would think that the selectors at the very least would have some explaining to do. Nope. In India, our selectors are immune from any kind of questioning. In fact our chairman of selectors is so busy that he has no time for the media. Not that it would have made an ounce of a difference. The BCCI have banned the selectors from speaking to the media. The cricket loving public, the only reason why Indian administrators run the world game, have no say in our cricketing system. We need to meekly accept every decision the BCCI makes and even if we have genuine concerns we will not get any answers because the BCCI does not believe we need to know how or why certain decisions are made.

Looking at the squad that’s been selected for the forthcoming test series against New Zealand and the T20 world cup that follows, there are many question marks against certain selections. What has Suresh Raina done to justify his place in the test side? Last time I checked Raina was dropped after a disastrous tour to England where his technique against the short ball was ruthlessly exposed. Since then, he’s scored runs in a few ODI’s and suddenly he’s back in the test side. Has Raina done anything to prove that he’s managed to sort out the weaknesses that led to him being dropped in the first place?

Ishant Sharma is back in the test squad after a serious surgery that has kept him out of cricket for quite some time. He has had absolutely no match practice since then and yet he’s back as part of the team. Wouldn’t it have been wiser to allow him to play in the Buchi Babu tournament or try and get a contract to play abroad so that his match fitness could have been clearly ascertained?

India’s last home series was against the West Indians. Rahul Sharma was a part of this squad. He did not get a game and yet he has been axed from the squad to face New Zealand. Whilst I still do not believe that Sharma deserved a place in India’s test squad, having picked him, it would have only been fair to give him a go. This decision would have still made sense if Chawla had been setting the Ganges on fire with his bowling. Far from that, Chawla’s domestic figures in recent times have been decidedly ordinary.

There is also a patent lack of clarity when it comes to the role the seniors’ are going to play in the long run. Even during his best years, Sehwag was average away from home. His record in places like England, South Africa and New Zealand has always been poor. In recent times his away record has been woeful. What then is the plan? Is he still going to open come South Africa in 2014? Tendulkar is 39 and Laxman is 37. Laxman’s fitness has always been a concern and he’s another player whose away record in recent times has been average. Tendulkar will be nearing 41 when India travels away next. Would it not make more sense to use the relatively easier conditions at home to blood in youngsters?

In the past, India had honorary selectors who were not paid for their services. In order to ‘professionalize’ the selection system, the BCCI decided that they will pay the selectors a good deal of money for services rendered. In any professional setup, especially in one where the ‘professionals’ are earning an absolute fortune, a non-negotiable requirement needs to be accountability. If the selectors are not accountable for any of the decisions that they make, if they do not have to explain the logic behind selections to the public, what is then the difference between this system and the honorary system we had in previous years? We may as well go back to that system – at least we’d have the consolation of knowing that the selectors aren’t going to be paid a fortune for doing a pathetic job. For the moment, I guess we need to be happy that Srikkanth reign as chairman of selectors is finally over. It may not get much better but the good news is that it is very difficult for it to get any worse.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

A Rant at the IPL


The lack of international Indian cricket over the last few months has kept me off writing for some time. Over this period, India have played the absolutely pointless Asia cup and have since then been tied up with the IPL. The IPL, as always, raised numerous eyebrows. Most games were played in front of packed houses and whilst TV ratings have dropped a wee bit, it does seem as if most of India is still in love with the IPL.

My feelings on the IPL have not changed a great deal. I remain a critic and could not muster the enthusiasm to watch more than a few passages of play here and there. This was not the case when the IPL started. To understand the impact of the IPL in India, we need to go back to the 2007 T20 world cup. The BCCI were anti T20 until then and had no intention of allowing the game to flourish in India. The BCCI’s view point stemmed from their belief that 50 over cricket would make more money than T20 as it is played over a longer period of time. What they did not anticipate was that India would be crowned world champions in a format that there weren’t even interested to begin with. India’s faithful cricket-following public, who are not accustomed to too much international success, lapped up the format and made T20 cricket an instant hit in the country.

Thinking back, I enjoyed the T20 success India achieved in that world cup as much as the next guy. Unlike England or South Africa, India had not played any T20 cricket and save a handful of Pro 20 games that I had seen on South African TV, I had very little exposure to T20 cricket. The novelty value and the instant entertainment of the format made that first world cup memorable.

The one thing you can never accuse the BCCI of is not spotting an opportunity to make money. The BCCI realized that T20 cricket was the next big thing and moved quickly and decisively to setup the IPL. Whilst it is true that the doomed ICL did have an impact on the cricket watching public of India, the lack of marketable stars meant that the level of interest in the ICL was never great. The IPL teams on the other hand were all owned by multi-millionaires. This meant that many of the best players around the world were ready to come and become a part of the IPL because the franchises could afford to pay them a mini fortune for their services.

For me, however, the first season and a bit of the IPL made me realize a lot of truths about the competition. Once the novelty value wore off, you realized that the quality of cricket on display is ordinary to say the least. Bowlers have little or no role and it all boils down to who can score more boundaries. The commentary team with obvious instructions to keep harping on the quality of the IPL started getting on my nerves. The over-the-top advertising gimmicks employed by the broadcasting networks and the commentators made things worse. The fact though, is that despite these reservations, I probably would have still gone along with the IPL if it was not for the impact the IPL is having and threatens to have on the future of test match cricket in India.

I don’t think that the IPL is the sole cause of all India’s problems in test cricket at the moment. But there is no doubt in my mind that it has played a role and the greater worry as far as I’m concerned is the impact the IPL is going to have on test cricket in the long run. Looking back at India’s defeats to England and Australia, fatigue almost certainly played a role. I’m not suggesting that India would have won or even drawn against these teams had they been more match fit then they were, but I certainly think the series would have been slightly more competitive. After all, at least in England, India did have their opportunities in both the 1st and 2nd test. If the team had been a little fitter and more match-ready, who knows what could have happened?

The IPL is undoubtedly the prime reason behind fatigue. Sure the IPL lasts only for a few hours, but we need to consider not just the physical demands on the players but also, perhaps more importantly, the mental toll that constant travel, the pressure of justifying a big price tag, the after match parties and so on have on the cricketers. I’ve heard a lot of commentators blaming the cricketers for playing the IPL and not prioritizing test cricket. The BCCI keep telling us, the gullible public that they will immediately rest individuals who ask for the same. IMHO this is ridiculous. Why blame the players when most of us would do exactly the same thing if we were offered a fortune for a few weeks’ work? The other thing to consider here are the owners of the various franchises. These are some of the richest and most powerful men in the country and they have invested an absolute fortune in their respective franchises. None of these men or women are ‘cricket lovers’ with the noble intention of spreading the cricketing gospel. Instead, all of them are involved in the IPL in order to make a profit. If tomorrow a Sachin Tendulkar or a M.S. Dhoni wants to sit out of the IPL, I cannot imagine the owners of their respective franchises being very happy with that decision. After all, Indian cricket has always been about the star.

In addition to fatigue, the IPL and T20 cricket in general, encourages a brand of cricket that has virtually no hope of succeeding in test match cricket. The commentators arguing in favor of the IPL always talk about similar statements being made in the late 60’s when 50 over cricket first made its appearance. Whilst this is true, what they forget are the similarities that 50 over cricket shares with test match cricket. As a contest, 100 overs is a long time. A batsman for most of a 50- over match still has the time to see off a few balls before having to go for his shots. Similarly, a bowler can bowl an aggressive line and length to attacking fields for some time before he may have to resort to defensive bowling. In T20 cricket, there’s just no time for any of this. The batsman attack, and the bowlers defend and this is true for the duration of 90% of the T20 matches that are played. This 1 dimensional way of playing the game has taken all context out of cricket, which for time immemorial has been a contest between bat and ball and not bat and bat.

This method of playing the game has already started to impact the quality of test match cricket. Bowlers are content to bowl defensive lengths to batsman who seem to find it necessary to try and launch every 2nd ball out of the park. It is no wonder then that the younger Indian generation has struggled to come to terms with test match cricket. The BCCI have made this problem worse by using the IPL as a benchmark for selection into the Indian team. Yusuf Pathan, Ravindra Jadeja, Rahul Sharma, Manpreet Goni and many others have broken into the Indian side solely on IPL performances. It is hardly a coincidence that none of them have gone to achieve anything significant in India colors.

So the question that many people are asking at the moment is whether the IPL can coexist with test match cricket. In theory, this is possible. However, given the priorities of the administrators in most countries today, it is unlikely that this can happen for too much longer. Apart from England and Australia, test cricket already attracts no crowds in other parts of the world. The administrators, especially in India, treat test match cricket like the poor cousin of T20 cricket. Tests begin on a Monday or Tuesday ensuring that even the few people who might want to attend a game are unable to do so. Pitches in many parts of the country are so docile that the chances of a team winning are remote. The few big brands that are interested in advertising during a test match, insist that everything possible is done to try and ensure that a game goes on for as long as possible. Matches are constantly being organized in venues that have never attracted a crowd for test cricket. The few centers in India that still care a damn about test cricket, never get important games. The Ranji trophy, which was once the most prestigious domestic tournament in India, is today a meaningless competition watched by nobody. 

The facts are clear. The BCCI are interested in one thing and one thing only – to make as much money out of cricket as possible. The IPL provides the perfect platform to do just that. The combination of instant entertainment with film stars is a hit with the urban youth, many of them who do not care a damn about the quality of cricket on display. The success of the IPL has also given the BCCI the perfect excuse to forget about the humiliation in England and Australia. India don't play test match cricket away from home for a long time now. Even if the results of England and Australia are repeated in South Africa in early 2013, does the administration care? After all, there will always be another IPL to push all India's problems underneath the carpet.

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Where to Now?

I know I've disappeared from the blog scene for a while. The only reason for this is that every test match in the current series seems to be following the exact same pattern. It's almost as if the players are reenacting the same script over and over again and there's absolutely nothing new to add. When India got hammered in England the sole consolation then seemed to be that things were unlikely to get any worse. Well unfortunately for India, it has and how.

The question uppermost on every Indian fan's mind at the moment is where do India go from here. The incompetence of cricket administration in India means fans have scant reason to feel optimistic. The administrators are never going to accept their share of the blame for the current debacle and instead the most likely scenario is that the buck will be passed around without anybody accepting mistakes. Nevertheless, as cricket fans we cannot do much apart from hoping for the best. 

Here are a list of measures that IMO will help Indian cricket become more competitive in the long run.

1) Embrace Change

All 3 seniors in the current Indian side have been fantastic players for India. Dravid & Tendulkar are already assured of a place in the pantheon of great players and no matter what happens in their careers after this, that is unlikely to change. Laxman may not be remembered in the same league as the other two, but has undoubtedly still been one of India's great test match batsman. In an ideal world, the selectors would have planned the transition process better and would have allowed the youngsters a longer run in the side with 1 or 2 of the seniors to guide them. Unfortunately, it is too late for that. The emergence of Virat Kohli in this series has also sent a clear message that the youngsters are ready and it will be a crime to keep them out of the side any longer. It's not as if the seniors are helping India stay competitive. So in such a scenario, you may as well give the youngsters a go. Even if India lose, they will atleast have the satisfaction of knowing that the next generation have had some valuable exposure to international cricket.

2) The Opening Conundrum

Any self respecting cricket side need to believe that they can be the best in the world. The objective should be to dominate world cricket. In such a scenario, we cannot encourage flat track bullies, no matter how effective they are in certain conditions. Throw Virender Sehwag into a test match on flat subcontinental tracks and he is one of the finest players ever. Throw him into a track with a bit of life and movement and he is as clueless as a fish out of water. If we were to analyze Sehwag's record away from the subcontinent, the picture that emerges is truly shocking. He averages in the mid twenties in England, South Africa and New Zealand and after the current series ends, his record in Australia will be nothing great either. Sehwag has made 4 100's way from the subcontinent in a test match career that has spanned over 10 years. Not good enough. 

Gambhir sails in a similar boat. His technique away from home has been consistently exposed and it's about time he is told in no uncertain terms that he either performs or makes way for a younger player. Drastic changes are often not the way forward, but India have reached a stage where they have run out of options. Get a youngster in the side and give him a long rope; as Kohli has demonstrated in this series, it is not possible for a youngster used to playing on flat subcontinental tracks to start scoring runs immediately in different conditions. Give them time and hopefully they will learn.

3) The Captaincy

Seldom, if ever, has a captain looked as clueless as M.S. Dhoni has over the last few months. His captaincy has been insipid, uninspiring and at times downright pathetic. It does not help that his contribution on the field, be it with bat or behind the stumps has been fairly ordinary. In addition, Dhoni has failed to inspire his players and if anything seems to accept defeat before anybody else. His field settings are often inexplicable and tactics questionable. India cannot afford a non performing captain. His record in ODI cricket is undisputed, but the time has come for India to look beyond Dhoni as far as the test captaincy is concerned.  In fact I'd go as far as to say that Dhoni has been a liability for India in test matches played away from home. Saha is certainly a better keeper and whilst it's too early to judge his batting skills, he has by supporting Kohli in the ongoing 4th test at least shown a semblance of technical ability. Give him a chance.

4) Restructure Domestic Cricket

The historic and once important Ranji trophy has today become a joke. Statistics are revealing - Sachin Tendulkar has never faced a ball from Anil Kumble in the Ranji trophy. I don't blame Tendulkar or Kumble for this, but it's nevertheless a clear indication of how low the Ranji trophy figures in the pecking order. How are the younger lot supposed to improve if they never get the opportunity of playing against the big wigs?

The Ranji Trophy Final between Rajasthan & Tamil Nadu highlighted the problems that domestic cricket in India suffers from. The biggest culprit was the wicket; a final certainly deserved better. It was a wicket that had absolutely nothing in it for the bowlers and the side batting first were always going to be in the driver's seat. Rajasthan at no stage were looking for a win and the focus seemed entirely on ensuring that they do not lose. It's no wonder then that Indian cricketers coming into the national side after playing in such an environment, come in with a similar mind-set. 

The laws that govern Ranji trophy need to be changed. Pitches need to be looked at. I don't have a problem with rank turners - they are as much of a test as fast and bouncy wickets that India encounters abroad. However, most of the wickets in India are not rank turners any more. They offer no help for any type of bowler and usually results in the most boring of cricket. Domestic cricketers need to play more on challenging wickets. If not, they are never going to learn.

5) County Cricket

Ask Zaheer Khan what made him the bowler he is today and phat comes the answer - County Cricket. Zaheer's stint in England with Worcestershire helped him understand his own game a lot better. It helped him become a better bowler. Once upon a time county cricket was considered as the finishing school. Players from all over the world would play for the county sides and hone their skills in challenging conditions making them better players. Given this, I don't understand the BCCI's attitude towards county cricket. Their reluctance in allowing their contracted players to play county cricket is preventing them from improving their techniques in bowler friendly conditions.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact is that people have been talking about this transition process for a couple of years now. It could have and should have been managed a whole lot better and the only people to blame for this are the administrators / selectors. The next year and a half will determine if test cricket has a future in India. If the BCCI, as they have done so often, choose to shove every setback underneath the carpet and continue to pretend as if everything is hunky dory, Indian cricket is doomed. Change is no longer an option, it is a non negotiable necessity. 













Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Humiliated

I'm too depressed to write match reviews for the ongoing series between India & Australia. Instead, I'm going to reproduce here a conversation that I had with a few friends on Facebook. The conversation pretty much echo my thoughts for the moment.

India should do a Zimbabwe and get themselves expelled from Test cricket.... we can then play a pentangular with West indies, Zimbabwe and New Zealand and Bangladesh at Dharmashala.
 ·  ·  · Yesterday at 11:29am · 


     
    • 6 people like this.
      • Naveen Kapoor No da...... India should stop playing altogether. This series has so far reminded me only of the 1991-92 series..... I remember vividly a cartoon on the Indian express newspaper back in those days...it depicted a rotating door installed at the Indian pavilion which never stopped rotating during an Indian batting innings because the procession of batsmen continued. None had the balls to stay on crease.
        Tuesday at 12:06pm ·  ·  1
      • Rohit Jaishankar Lol ! It starts at 3:30 in the morning here. I wonder why I waste time watching these morons play. Let's give up test cricket and stick to the IPL where are 'extremely gifted' youngsters can go back to bashing the likes of Parameshwaran & co.
        Tuesday at 1:14pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar And about the pentangular series, NZ just beat the same Australian team that is making 'the world's greatest batting line-up' quake in their boots. Not bad for a country of 4.4 Million people. I'd trade a lot of our clowns for some of the Kiwis in a heartbeat. They may not be the most talented in the world, but they atleast play with some bloody heart.
        Tuesday at 1:18pm ·  ·  1
      • Deepak Srinivasan R.Ashwin has a better batting average than virat kohli.. wonder why we even took pragyan ohja on the tour.. 4-0 for sure!
        Tuesday at 1:56pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi Would have added Sri Lanka to this list except they have just ebaten South Africa IN south Africa. Thilan S'weera the great scoring a century against Steyn and co while our boys struggling to notch 200 against some unknowns. Too funny.
        Tuesday at 2:42pm · 
      • Shashank Singh So faithless, and so fickle...if my memory dose not fail me quite a few of you were raving about the same team India after the South Africa tour...the series is not even half way through...I still have hope a win in Sydney n Adelaide and Australia may either draw or win in Perth.
        Tuesday at 3:37pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Blind faith is pointless. We have more cricketers than the rest of the world put together. More money than the rest of the cricketing world put together and yet we are satisfied with the most ordinary performances. Look at Australia. Their fans & their press have called this the worst Aussie team ever. They set out to win everything and when that's not achieved they see it as a disappointment. That's the kind of attitude we need. This year Australia have beaten Sri Lanka away (something India have not done in over 15 years), drawn with South Africa away, drew with NZ at home and look like they are well on their way against India. This after a transition process that saw them lose almost a squad of fantastic players. Where are we going to be after 2-3 of our cricketers retire?
        Tuesday at 3:46pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi Very lttle to separate the two sides if you ask me - except for the captaincy. Australia are able to escape from sticky situations thanks to MSD' s limited grasp of test captaincy. I think we're in a situation where all the test nations apart from England have reached varying standards of mediocrity because they have stopped prioritising the longer format. I don't see an obvious way up for India in the short term as the schedule doesn't allow it. But Aus, SL, NZ and the rest are all in the same boat.
        Tuesday at 3:54pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar India's problem is going to be retirements. We have relied on 2-3 individuals for over 15 years. Zaheer isn't going to be around for too much longer either. Where are the replacements?
        Tuesday at 4:06pm · 
      • Shashank Singh I don’t think so we are that bad...our bowling has been good. Agree Dhoni needs to get a better grip may be...but who are we to judge..the guy has played more days of cricket then all of us have watched n played....the only thing that i think needs to get sorted is Gautam gambhirs approach. think he is still too stuck in ODI or T20 mode..if he and Viru can survive the first 20 overs of every innings, its game on. Something that even Ganguly pointed out today. 20 over of gambhir stayin in mean the ball is not new for middle order and 20 overs of Viru mean 100 on the board.
        Tuesday at 4:15pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi I will be very surprised if both Dravid and Laxman stay on after this series. We will not have any overseas tours till Nov 2013, what more is left for them to achieve? Need to start experimenting as soon as this series is over.
        Tuesday at 4:22pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Yep our bowling has been a bright spot, but the batting problems IMHO is not restricted to GG. If your looking long-term, we need a team that can adapt to all conditions. GG has averaged under 30 over the last 2 years and that's a long time to keep failing. Sehwag is obviously a fine player but if you look at cold hard facts then his record does not stand up to scrutiny away from home. His average in NZ, SA & Eng (arguably the most seam bowler friendly destinations in the world) is in the mid 20's. Sure he's played some glorious knocks away from home, but his record suggests that he does not do it anywhere near often enough unlike his record at home where he is simply phenomenal. Kohli is playing his 6th test and has had 5 poor ones. We can go on about how gifted he is, but sooner rather than later he needs to start repaying the team's faith. Dhoni is another bloke who averages under 30 outside the subcontinent. This does not mean they are all rubbish - but the facts are that Dravid & Tendulkar in particular and VVS to a lesser extent have scored the bulk of India's runs away from home. You cannot win abroad consistently when you rely solely on half your batting line-up.
        Tuesday at 4:28pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi I think we need to accept that the glory days are over and move on. The team should be slowly rebuilt and we should stick with a core group of youngsters..Kohli, Sharma, Yadav.. even if they don't do that well to begin with. A couple of years of mediocre results is OK by me if we are able to establish a young competetive side in that period.
        Tuesday at 4:46pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Fair enough. But what are the chances of that happening? Our guys will kick butt at home only to have the same problems when they tour abroad next. Ban the IPL and get them playing domestic cricket in England. We've seen Zak's transition after his stint in England, no reason why it cannot work the same way for the others. Doubt they will learn much playing for CSK or RCB.
        Tuesday at 4:53pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi Yup, the chances of that happening are slim. Which is why I'm hoping RSD and VVS decide to retire after this series. IPL is here to stay, we should be thankful that international cricket is surviving at all. But yes it is critical that some of these guys play county cricket in the off season. Regarding GG, he did well in SA last year. Some good coaching will put him right.
        Tuesday at 5:01pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Yeah, I do agree with regards to GG. He showed plenty of spunk in SA. What's annoying though is that this weakness was obvious to us sitting here watching cricket on TV. I had even blogged about how he had to get rid of this tendency to angle his bat towards the slip cordon on bouncier wickets. Should he have not got his 'coaching' done before the series started? I agree to a large extent with regards to the seniors stepping down, but I'm not sure whether we should completely ignore short-term gains. With test cricket as a whole coming under pressure from all the other stuff on TV, India losing consistently over 2 years could be the worst thing to happen to test cricket in India.
        Tuesday at 5:18pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi We're playing pretty much only at home for the next 2 years, so i don't think we will lose consistently. In any case, once the big guns and above all SRT decide to call it quits, I think the popularity of cricket as an intl sport will go down. We'll just have to hope the admins have the good sense not to put all their money into the IPL. Test crickets' audience is pretty stable I feel but is definitely the monority.
        Tuesday at 5:35pm · 
      • Naveen Kapoor Cold hard facts....hmmm..... cold hard facts state that we suck on bouncier pitches. Cold hard facts state that there have been only 2 countries...apart from THE NETHERLANDS and IRELAND where teams have posted scores in excess of 400 in an ODI inning. And thats India and SA (8 OUT OF 10 INSTANCES). SoShashank Singh..... it answers your question on why people were raving about our performance in SA... simply because the pitches there suite our style of batting. Back in early 90's...the pitches in SA were bouncy...now they are more conducive to seam but in general the ball comes on to the bat well.

        Cold hard facts stare in our face ..... our work ethics are nowhere close to what they were when Gary Kirsten was incharge.Duncan Fletcher in my opinion is trying to maintain status quo with the big guns of the team.... not trying to fiddle too much. The discipline or the lack of it is there for all to see. We have good bowlers no doubt, Pattinson is no better than Ishant Sharma. Its just the application that is different. Was just reading an article about Craig McDermotts role in the current aussie set up.Where is our bowling coach...wait a minute...do we even have one coz my memory fails me. We havent had a bowling coach in ages.... but Gary was managing fantastically. Who is this Eric Simmons anyway???

        Discipline has never been our strong point. What the F*** is Zak doing with a belt around his back. Does he even deserve to be playing at this level.... he has the skill... where is the bloody fitness??? Brett Lee battled multiple surgeries on his ankle to return to the ODI fold. Agreed....Aussies are blessed wth sportier genes...but we can't be so bad.
        Tuesday at 5:50pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Naveen Kapoor - not sure I agree about South Africa. South Africa is the country where batting has been extremely difficult even for non subcontinental teams. In fact, if you look at India's record away, their worst record is in South Africa where they have really struggled to cope with the bounce. Tendulkar apart, nobody in this Indian line up has a decent record in SA which shows how difficult batting has generally been there. By contrast, most of our guys have decent records in Australia where the pitches tend to be flat. There's a lot of bounce but not as much seam movement as you would have in ENG / SA.
        Tuesday at 6:14pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar I agree with the fitness part completely. One look at Zak / Yuvi on India's tour to England, showed us how seriously our team takes its fitness routines.
        Tuesday at 6:16pm · 
      • Suhas Cadambi The overall fitness of our players isn't great, but it's a lot better than what it used to be. My feeling is the players are doing all they can to keep fit (except for sitting out the IPL) but the punishing schedule eventually takes its toll. Australia themselves have enough problems with injuries.
        Tuesday at 6:30pm · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar I'm not sure if it is actually any better than it used to be. OK, India never did have a great pace attack, but the likes of Srinath / Prasad / Agarkar never broke down anywhere near as much as some of these guys. I'm not even sure if you can blame excessive cricket - how many matches have the likes of Sreesanth / Aaron etc played recently? The other issue is of course the continued refusal to address fielding woes. Have you seen Ashwin field or run between the wickets? Or for that matter Sharma / Yadav / Sehwag / Zaheer ... this being in addition to an ageing senior line-up whose fielding skills have certainly deteriorated in the last couple of years.
        Tuesday at 6:44pm · 
      • Badri Lokanathan Been monitoring this discussion and I don't get one thing. I expected fitness and fielding standards to have improved with the proliferation of limited overs cricket. Sounds like that hasn't happened. Why?
        18 hours ago · 
      • Badri Lokanathan Btw, innings defeat in the making at Sydney.
        18 hours ago · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Yup, the only question seems to be innings and how many. MSD seems clueless and our bowling is back to doing what it does best - bowling rubbish. What a hammering !
        14 hours ago · 
      • Suhas Cadambi This is depressing. Trouble is our test strategy has revolved around the batsmen posting tall totals and the bowling wearing the opposition down. Our bowlers can only do so much in the absence of scoreboard pressure. I'm not ruling out a strong recovery in the second innings, but have to hope Perth and Adelaide are either batsman-friendly or complete greentops, else we're cooked.
        12 hours ago · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Recovery in this test is next to impossible. The lead's stretched to un-manageable proportions and there's just too much time left. The best we can hope for now is for the team to show some fight. Given the way our batsman have been batting, I don't think we will even compete on a green top. India has taken a giant step backwards this year. Losing is acceptable - losing in this manner is not ! This is humiliating.
        12 hours ago · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Suhas Cadambi If Gambhir flops again in the 2nd innings would you drop him? What about Kohli? I'm not entirely convinced by Rahane, but he does have mountains of runs in domestic cricket, so at the very least he should have a better temperament then some of the others. Think Rohit Sharma opening is an option?
        12 hours ago · 
      • Suhas Cadambi I'm not a fan of sticking middle order players in the opening slot (despite the success of Sehwag), so ideally Rahane would not be opening, and certainly not Rohit. Having said that Gambhir is out of sorts and given the state of the series I'd be willing to try Rahane (making him clearly understand he is only a short term opening option). Kohli..well I don't think swapping him for Rohit will change our fortunes much, the big 3 still have to do the bulk of the work.
        10 hours ago · 
      • Suhas Cadambi But this is exactly why I would like Laxman and Dravid to step aside when the series is done. We can finally give Rohit/Kohli/Rahane an extended run instead of having them fight out for that no.6 spot.
        10 hours ago · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar Rahane was apparently an opening batsman before he started playing down the order. If Kohli fails, then Rohit certainly deserves a go IMO. Pujara is another bloke whose been unlucky to miss out. He was #1 in the pecking order. There are also definite question marks with regards to MSD's captaincy.
        9 hours ago · 
      • Badri Lokanathan Basically India's famed batting lineup has failed them. Even if MSD's tactics seem questionable, what alternatives are there after putting up a measly total on a decent wicket? It is unfortunate that test openers like Jaffer and Chopra have fallen by the wayside - Gambhir clearly needs a break. Dravid seems the only one capable of hunkering down for 20 overs and even he failed.
        3 hours ago · 
      • Badri Lokanathan I do not believe India will reach 250 if AUS makes 600+. The batsmen will be mentally and physically spent.
        2 hours ago · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar I agree. IMO the problem that India face is the lack of skills amongst the younger players to play test match cricket. Like Dravid in England, I think Sachin has looked absolutely brilliant in this series so far, but is constantly under pressure because wickets have kept tumbling at the other end. Look back at any of India's landmark victories outside the subcontinent and 90% of the time there would have been an innings of substance by Dravid / Tendulkar. As I've mentioned before, you cannot perform consistently away from home when your relying on half your batting line up to provide all the runs.
        about an hour ago · 
      • Rohit Jaishankar I think Jaffer / Chopra were poorly treated. India have always gone for style over substance. They even dropped Laxman at one point to accommodate Yuvraj Singh. We all know how Yuvi's career turned out !
        about an hour ago ·